There is a war going on in Hollywood between nature and man, and in the areas where man has the advantage, nature is truly beaten down. Nowhere is this more evident than with the trees along Santa Monica Blvd. east of Highland. These poor damn trees, you would think that they would just give it up, but then that is not in their makeup, so they struggle on against all odds: excessive pruning, street pollution, vandalism, lack of space, water, and care. They remind me of fish that have been pulled from the sea and continue to flop around as though still submerged, gills opening and closing to water that is not there. These fish act as if the water might just be out of their reach, rather than it being completely removed, but perhaps that is just in their nature to "think" this way. I am quite sure that fish do not have a concept of being "out of the water", and in the same way, I suspect that trees lack any sense of being "out of nature".
Many trees thrive out of nature, granted, if their caregivers approximate a nature environment, but there are not any examples of these trees on Santa Monica Blvd. east of Highland.
A lovely tree-lined Pasadena street |
Poor chopped tree |
Happily, with trees being trees, many have survived and have sprouted new branches from their chopped stumps, and it is hoped that the imbeciles who caused the damage last year have now moved on to other distractions (who says there aren't silver linings to stupidity?) I get the sense that the trees along Vine, after the acts of violence, just continued to do what trees do, which is continue to grow in any way possible, even after being damaged and left for dead.
Perhaps someday the city planners will start over from scratch, pouring new sidewalks and pulling the gnarled old trees to replace them with fresh, strong new saplings. We are obliged.
A West Hollywood walking lane |
***
From time to time I get a therapy client suffering from the effects of depression, and I usually love these clients. You might think that it would be depressing to see a depressed client for therapy, but I find that it is often the opposite. They would not be in therapy if they wanted to continue being depressed. So even though there is at times a slower pace to the progress, there is certainly intent to drive it forward.
The way I see it, depression is not something that is a "part of us". I hate the phrase "He/she is depressed", because it immediately limits the expressive capacity of the person. I see depression as something that affects people rather than something that they are (similarly, we say we are suffering from a cold, not we are the cold). While I do agree that there are certain hereditary aspects and chemical conditions that invite greater vulnerability to the effects of stressors, I strongly favor the theory that depression is a response, not a disease. What supports this? The fact that clients can locate times when depression does not affect them. How then can they be depressed?
The term disease is generally used for any condition that can be biologically sourced, and that would include conditions of the brain. But just because something shows up in one's biology, it does not immediately indicate that it started there. I favor the disease definitions that include environmental stressors as sources of depression, but for me I would go further and say that depression is a condition directly sourced in the environment.
Our biological bodies know what to do "in nature". They are amazingly efficient biological structures that run really well when given what they need. However, it would not be a stretch to assert that in modern life, our bodies rarely get "what they need". What are those things? Well, the simplest answer is good food, natural sleep, fresh air, clean water, daily movement, basic shelter (note the qualifiers). What else? We need people. Not just any people, though, but people we feel safe around and whom we are attached to. When we don't get those things, we look for substitutes, if we can find them. But the substitutes never fill the place of the real thing longer than a temporary span of time. Eventually, our bodies protect themselves by shutting down the need, which can have a physical and mental effect: anger, isolation, anxiety, paranoia, and depression. This is the basis of the idea that depression is a healthy response to an ill society, and you don't need me to tell you of the ills of society.
But I will. Profit driven rather than profit sharing, class-ism rather than inclusion, closed doors rather than community, sex rather than intimacy, strangers rather than tribe, independence rather than interdependence, cash rather than barter, narcissism rather than humility, boredom rather than curiosity. Disconnect from food sources, labor, dirt, nature, civility, manners, risk, play, silence, walking, laughing, thinking, simplicity, patience, wisdom, respect. Reliance on technology, walls, comfort, money, status, ownership, power, validation, opinion, dogma, violence, youth. We all play some or all of the game, we all feel the effects, but we all have the ability to choose toward our nature, once we are made aware that we have the choice.
Thriving during the California "Spring" |
***
No matter how old I get, I notice that I continue to bloom. Some years I only show a few blooms, but as long as I care for my nature, I will have the ability and the desire to flower in the sun. If I forget how to do this, I only need to walk half a block and let the trees on Santa Monica Blvd., east of Highland, remind me.
Doing what it knows how to do. |
You've hit the proverbial nail on the head when you said that depression is a response, not a disease. We may have been psychologically (or physically) vandalized by the ills of society, but our natural resilience allows us to sprout and bloom again - like those vandalized trees (you expressed it much more eloquently than I).
ReplyDeleteThanks for a very thought-provoking post, Tony.
As a child, I remember all those gorgeous tree-lined streets in Pasadena.
The hopeful part of the equation, Jon, is that society affects us, and we affect society. That is why I try to focus on my behavior rather than others, though I am happy to illuminate bad behavior as a route for awareness and change. You have taken a tact I once considered but discarded: to remove yourself from society as much as possible. I guess I reconsidered when I realized that I would be leaving some wonderful people behind and bringing my bitterness and anger with me. Not so appealing!
Deletebloom where you are planted, look pretty, smell sweet.
ReplyDeleteYou are a philosopher, Anne Marie!
DeleteI need a quiet time to read this thoroughly; I will be back anon.
ReplyDeleteYou share some interesting thoughts on depression. I like the idea that depression is a result of the mind trying to shut down the need for those things it isn't getting, for instance a sense of community with other people and with nature.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment, Java. You know, it is just a theory, but any theory that reduces shame in the person suffering is a theory that facilitates treatment. A lot of my clients are actually proud to think that their depression may be a HEALTHY response to not being well taken care of. Then they get to "let it go" as they begin to get their needs met. :-)
Delete#1 you continue to be one of the best writers on my blog list; it is a pleasure to read you.
ReplyDelete#2 - your simile of patients with depression to the struggling trees is exquisite. I liked it a lot
#3 - we were taught to be constantly on alert not to equivocate the diease with the person. It's too easy to say 'he's a diabetic' rather than a person with diabetes. Yours is a reminder to me to keep on alert.
#4 - for me, clinical depression vs. dynamic depression makes me think of disease in the first case and your approach in the second. I spend a lot of my time trying to sort them out.
#5 - I am so glad you were able to manage a proper "sit-down" to read my essay, and I must say I was curious what your take would be, since we are both "mental health professionals". I agree with all your points, and especially #1. :-) With that, I would imagine that your profession struggles more than mine with the disease model. But I hold that we can work with each other in the best interest of the client.
Delete